Project for the New American Century: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Rebuilding America's Defenses''' | |||
*https://resistir.info/livros/rebuilding_americas_defenses.pdf | *https://resistir.info/livros/rebuilding_americas_defenses.pdf | ||
*https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/25398/Ferdigxmasteroppgave.pdf | *https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/25398/Ferdigxmasteroppgave.pdf | ||
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses_2 | *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses_2 | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."[48] Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that the Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.[52] | Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."[48] Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that the Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.[52] | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 17 March 2023
Rebuilding America's Defenses
- https://resistir.info/livros/rebuilding_americas_defenses.pdf
- https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/25398/Ferdigxmasteroppgave.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses_2
Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."[48] Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that the Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.[52]