Meeting summary for ChatPeople AfterChat Zoom (11/19/2024)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This summary is generated by AI and is not reviewed by a human; errors may exist.
| Quick recap | |
| The meeting revolved around discussions on potential global conflicts, the need for a regenerative future, and the importance of precision measurement and engineering to improve the planet. The participants also discussed the potential for humanity to control the weather, the need to focus on organizations that want to build a world that works for everyone, and the concept of innate understanding. Lastly, they explored the need for a solution that is better for the environment and cheaper than existing solutions, and the potential for collaboration and the development of a category system for organizing content. | |
| Next steps | |
| • Stan to seek clerical assistance for cataloging and organizing information in Other Networks. | |
| • George to introduce Stan to Bill Dell of Next Now Networks. | |
| • Stan to explore integrating AI for scraping and cataloging Humanity Rising episodes and presenter information. | |
| • George to connect Stan with the Buckminster Fuller archive at Stanford for potential collaboration on organizational systems. | |
| • George to email Stan with information on Robert E. Horn and other relevant contacts. | |
| • Stan to continue developing and refining the category system in Other Networks. | |
| • George to introduce Stan to Tom Chi for potential collaboration on regenerative solutions. | |
| • Stan to seek feedback from librarians or information science professionals on the Other Networks organizational system. | |
| Summary | |
| Potential War and Citizen Diplomats | |
| Paul discussed the potential for a war between the United States and Russia, attributing the avoidance of a war in the past to the efforts of citizen diplomats. He also expressed his belief that Putin does not want a war but does not want to lose face, and that Donald Trump's power base is not yet fully established. Paul also mentioned that Biden's provocative actions in Ukraine could have contributed to the current situation. Shannon agreed with Paul's analysis and suggested that the military-industrial complex should be disbanded. Stan expressed his confusion and concern about the situation, while George emphasized the need for a regenerative future and the importance of spontaneous cooperation. | |
| Controlling Weather and Transitioning to Livingry | |
| George discussed the potential for humanity to control and influence the weather, and the need to transition from weapon manufacturing to livingry. He emphasized the importance of precision measurement and the application of engineering and science to improve the planet. George also highlighted the potential for the internet to share information in real time, using the example of how Covid-19 had changed the world. He concluded by expressing optimism about the possibility of abundance and harmony with nature, and the need for a transition to achieve this. | |
| Creating Connections and Addressing Challenges | |
| In the meeting, Shannon expressed gratitude for the community and the work being done, emphasizing the importance of creating connections for future generations. Stan discussed the need to catalog information from the 2,000 presenters from humanity rising and to introduce them to each other for potential collaboration. Diana suggested organizing questions for a specific session with Colonel Wilkerson. Stan then shifted the discussion towards the need to focus on organizations that want to build a world that works for everyone, and the importance of making lists and describing their work. Rick highlighted the challenges posed by sociopathy and the phenomenon of deranged Trumpism, emphasizing the need to understand these issues to create a new paradigm. He also mentioned the importance of addressing neoliberalism and libertarianism as major drivers for illiberal democracy. | |
| Innate Understanding and Regenerative Solutions | |
| Stanley and George discussed the concept of innate understanding and the importance of allowing things that work to prevail. They compared this to the natural world, where if something doesn't work, it is discarded, and if it's bad, it goes in a different direction. They also discussed the thriving biodiversity on Earth and the potential for creating a synthesis of life. They mentioned David Malark, founder of the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive, and John D. Liu, who works on ecosystem restoration. They also touched on Tom Chi, an astrophysicist who now focuses on regenerative solutions to help humanity become net positive to nature. | |
| Exploring Environmentally Friendly Solutions | |
| George and Stanley discussed the need for a solution that is 30% better for the environment and 30% cheaper than existing solutions, with the potential to scale globally. Stanley expressed interest in understanding George's organizational structure and mentioned the need for clerical assistance to catalog and classify content from his website, Humanity Rising. George suggested Stanley meet Bill Dell, who he believed could provide valuable insights. Stanley also mentioned his use of Media Wiki software, which he found stable and reliable. The conversation ended with Stanley expressing interest in showing George his method of organizing content. | |
| Category System and Collaboration Discussion | |
| Stanley presented a category system he had developed, which he believed could be improved by nesting related categories. He also mentioned his involvement in the "Humanity Rising" project and his work on cataloging Philadelphia through Wikidelphia. George expressed admiration for Stanley's work and suggested a potential collaboration with the Buckminster Fuller archive at Stanford. He also mentioned Robert E. Horn, who had shared an office with Fuller, and Little Sis, a project that maps power structures. The conversation ended with George expressing his appreciation for Stanley's insights and the potential for future collaboration. | |
| AI-generated content may be inaccurate or misleading. Always check for accuracy. |
